July 8th, 2010

Court of Appeal For Ontario

Osgood Hall

130 Queen Street West

Toronto, Ontario

M5H 2N5       

Attn.:  Sandra Leal

File:  C50990  - Losier v. MMP Limited et al  (appeal against the Crown Defendants  

         only) ? Appeal date September 22^nd 2010

Fax:  416-327-6256

Dear Ms. Leal,

Per our conversation the other day I am sending you my fax request for Motion by Conference to List Judge for more time for oral arguments as per my factum certificate approximately 20 hours is required to appeal an 8 day Rule 21 Motion hearing by Justice Lofchik. 

Your standard letter only gives 20 minutes and is insufficient time for an unrepresented appellant with no law school training to appeal an 8 day Rule 21 Motion Hearing with more than one issue to be discussed:  discretion without authority of the Code, no immunity and loss of jurisdiction, the correct plain and obvious rule 21 test, Human Rights Employer complaints and case analysis facts pleaded sufficient for particularity in pleadings for all intentional torts pleaded, court transcript, no negligence tort pleaded, Minister of Attorney General can be sued in his own right without vicarious liability legal doctrine, and then the six intentional torts pleaded in claim. 

This standard time of 20 minutes barely gives me time to plead part IV the issues and law and maybe paragraph #6 in my factum particularly if the judges interrupt and ask questions, and 20 minutes seriously disadvantages my appeal.   I respectfully request more time per my factum certificate.   My position is that 20 minutes is prejudicial to my appeal, unconstitutional, and favours the Crown Respondents particularly the Minister of Attorney General who superintends all judicial offices in Ontario. 

I look forward to hearing from you.  Your assistance in this matter is greatly appreciated.

Sincerely,

Ms. Claudette Losier

Copy:  Maria Kotsopoulos   Fax:  416-593-5437

My Appeal C50990 includes the Crown applying the Code fraudulantly with the positive misrepresentation being the Code's preamble and purpose that "Everyone In Ontario Is Equal" with measures to codify per stare decisis of section 5 to 10 of the code being completely ignored by the Crown's Human Rights process in both jurisdicition human rights and ... See Morejudicially. My appeal includes the Crown acting without authority of the Code applying section 34 (no investigation) alleged rules of discretion to dismissed 4 complaints under section 36 (investigation) prima facie complaints made out without investigating any of complainant's witnesses. My Appeal has been set for September 22nd in Toronto allowing insufficient time of 20 minutes to argue 8 day Rule 21 Unconstitutional Motion order that includes judge refusing to abide by the UN Treaty and you can read my factum arguments for Women's Human Rights at:Gender Equality : Canada slips from 14th to 18th place " Politics'n'PoetryComment by Claudette Losier ? November 9, 2007 @ 10:04 pm | Reply ... THE APPELLANT, CLAUDETTE LOSIER, APPEALS to the Court of Appeal of Ontario from ... politicsnpoetry.wordpress.com/2007/11/08/gender-equality-canada-sli... - 211k - CachedThank you for your support